Get your own free workspace
View
 

FrontPage

Page history last edited by Huntervon Eames 1 year, 5 months ago

Welcome to COM 354 New Media Ethics

 

 Please find for our new e-publication here: newmediaethicspub.pdf  

Criteria for presentation:

 

1) just introduce what the dilemma is,

2) your initial personal response,

3) how you frame the issue through ethical approaches (at least 2)

4) reflection questions that recognize opposing views

 

 

Collaborative Project

 

DigitalDilemmas

 

Syllabus

 

PowerPoints

 

Readings/Viewing

 

Journals

 

Announcements

 

 

"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;"  The Constitution for the United States Section 8

 

**Online Journalism

 

  • Instantly distributed
  • Anyone can be a journalist 
  • No fact checking
  • No editor
  • No oversight
  • Sloppy (misleading)
  • Voluntary vs. Paid
  • Bias vs. Unbiased
  • Opinion and POV
  • Reputation (individual vs. institution) 
  • No final product (forever changing, malleable) 

 

 

 

Great Job Molly Thank You 

 

 

 

slan·der

 

slander pronunciation /ˈslændər/ Show Spelled[slan-der] Show IPA

 

–noun
1.  defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2.  a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
3.  Law . defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.–verb (used with object)
4.  to utter slander against; defame.
–verb (used without object)
5. to utter or circulate slander.

 

li·bel

libel pronunciation /ˈlaɪbəl/ Show Spelled [lahy-buhl] Show IPA noun, verb, -beled, -bel·ing or ( especially British ) -belled, -bel·ling.

 

–noun
1.Law .
a.defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.
b.the act or crime of publishing it.
c.a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
2.anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents.
–verb (used with object)
3.to publish a libel against.
4.to misrepresent damagingly.
5.to institute suit against by a libel, as in an admiralty court.

Comments (27)

Jesse said

at 6:45 pm on Aug 23, 2010

hi

Drew Fox said

at 6:45 pm on Aug 23, 2010

HI

jennifermvg22 said

at 6:45 pm on Aug 23, 2010

hey!

Jocelynn Ramsey said

at 6:45 pm on Aug 23, 2010

hey!!

Jesse said

at 6:46 pm on Aug 23, 2010

Can I please be an administrator???

Jeff Ward said

at 6:46 pm on Aug 23, 2010

Hey Dr. B

Kristin Harper said

at 6:47 pm on Aug 23, 2010

hey

lindsay_hoffman@mail.msj.edu said

at 6:47 pm on Aug 23, 2010

Im in

Sarah Hess said

at 6:47 pm on Aug 23, 2010

hey!

Molly said

at 6:47 pm on Aug 23, 2010

hello everyone :)

Cris Jonas said

at 6:49 pm on Aug 23, 2010

Hey

christopher_hunt@mail.msj.edu said

at 6:49 pm on Aug 23, 2010

I figured it out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Huntervon Eames said

at 7:57 pm on Aug 23, 2010

yay!!!!

christopher_hunt@mail.msj.edu said

at 7:44 pm on Aug 23, 2010

Abby wants to know if we get a break?

Jesse said

at 8:19 pm on Aug 28, 2010

ok so honestly i have no clue how to do this just to put it out there. I've gotten updates in my e mail but i can't find it on here actually

christopher_hunt@mail.msj.edu said

at 9:02 pm on Aug 28, 2010

If you look at the lower box on the right hand side of this web page you'll see a box that says "recent activity". That shows you the recent updates that were put on the page. Click on "More activity" at the bottom of the box and you'll be able to see everything that has happened and the day that it happened.

Huntervon Eames said

at 9:35 am on Sep 13, 2010

Great journals so far everyone! Keep in mind that you should be referencing the readings when answering prompts. Thanks!

Huntervon Eames said

at 9:27 pm on Sep 13, 2010

Hi all, check out the collaborative book link for writing your chapter. feel free to add sources there as well, if you like.

Huntervon Eames said

at 9:35 am on Sep 21, 2010

Thanks for the info Jesse, and thanks again for taking notes Molly - very helpful.

Huntervon Eames said

at 9:29 pm on Sep 27, 2010

Good class tonight. I think our experience 'in-world' tonight helped drive the point of "Phronēsis" or "practical wisdom" home, where we can gain principles of action from experiencing the virtual world and applying rational reflection. Maybe some of you can use this in your journal #4. BTW/ everyone should use this time to catch up on their journals and to start on their comparative ethics papers. Email me with questions and submit your dilemmas.

I will be updating the schedule and will try to post an agenda for next week's class soon. Make sure to get a Second Life account, download the browser and send me your name and I'll teleport you to campus. http://secondlife.com/

Best, -r

Huntervon Eames said

at 9:30 pm on Sep 27, 2010

Thanks Fox for use of your avi.

Cris Jonas said

at 5:12 pm on Sep 29, 2010

For my individual paper I would like to cover state internet filtering. I will use a variety of examples ranging from Google and China, to countries censoring citizen searches. Also, I can bring in outside ideas, like the possibility of Facebook being subpoenaed by the court system for their user’s information.

Huntervon Eames said

at 3:50 pm on Oct 4, 2010

this is a great topic with obvious differences of opinion depending on where you stand. I would choose one though - narrow the topic - to either FB used to subpoena people in court or China's Green Dam censorware system (or other specific aspects of Chinese censorship of the Internet). -r

Huntervon Eames said

at 8:28 am on Oct 5, 2010

Hello everyone, I'd like to offer some reflections on last night's class. People are doing a good job engaging with dilemmas, only we need to think about which frameworks we're applying and why (as opposed to applying only one familiar framework). Make sure to review these in Chapter 6 and ask questions whenever you need clarification. This is not easy material to absorb, it has to be worked over in reflection (re-read chapters more than once). As a recap, last night we covered feminist ethics or an ethics of care, virtue ethics, and Confucian ethics - then applied frameworks to dilemmas: ethics in design (Facebook), ethics of government surveillance, and the ethics of cyberbullying or how to ethically address cyberbullying. In an effort not to cyberbully people into adopting Second Life, next week we'll have a hybrid class where some of us will be in-world and others will be in the classroom. For those in-world, you can log in from anywhere you choose, but be prepared to focus on the class and keep shenanigans (flying, floating, etc) to a minimum during our class discussion and save high jinks for the breaks. Everyone should be prepared to present their digital dilemma papers next week. Those in-world practice using the voice features. And the class will have a mic and headphones to interact as well. Additionally, next week we may cover hacking, net neutrality and an array of other topics.

Huntervon Eames said

at 10:32 pm on Nov 15, 2010

Good class tonight. I am looking forward to your final projects. I'll have a draft of my intro next week and hopefully a mock-up of our PDF publication. If you have any ideas for cover art let me know! Because of Jeff's good idea of engaging more with 4chan, i posted an extra credit assignment here:http://is.gd/hb4HL
-r

Huntervon Eames said

at 12:05 pm on Dec 3, 2010

Hello everyone. Just sending you a gentle reminder that your final drafts are due via email by Sunday at around 5PM - this give me a little time to format.

Make sure to have sources in APA form. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

And send to robert_bodle@mail.msj.edu and paste to your wiki project page (under Collaborate Projects)


Very much looking forward to you projects!

best,
robert

You don't have permission to comment on this page.